阿拉伯语版REAP-S的验证与文化调适：一项验证性因子分析与Rasch分析研究

Abstract

Abstract Aim: To translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically validate the Arabic version of the REAP-S among Arabic speaking young adults using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT). Design: A cross-sectional methodological psychometric validation study. Methods: The study included 500 undergraduate and postgraduate nursing students recruited from Saudi universities during the 2025–2026 academic year. The REAP-S was translated into Arabic using standardized forward backward translation procedures and cross-cultural adaptation guidelines. Participants completed the Arabic REAP-S through an online self-administered questionnaire. Construct validity was evaluated using CFA with robust estimators, assessing the Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA), and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR). Rasch Measurement Theory was applied to examine item fit, response category functioning, person item targeting, and person reliability. We assessed internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and the Rasch Person Separation Index (PSI). Results: Psychometric analyses included 490 participants with a median age of 20 years (IQR = 19–22), of whom 54.1% were female. CFA supported the hypothesized one-factor structure and showed good model fit (CFI = 0.984, TLI = 0.978, RMSEA = 0.076, SRMR = 0.061). Standardized factor loadings ranged from 0.429 to 0.768, and internal consistency was good (Cronbach's α = 0.863). Rasch analysis confirmed the scale's unidimensionality, with satisfactory person reliability (Expected A Posteriori [EAP] = 0.872; Weighted Likelihood Estimate [WLE] = 0.848). All items demonstrated acceptable infit and outfit mean square statistics (0.826–1.311 and 0.866–1.283, respectively), with ordered response thresholds and adequate person-item targeting. Overall, the Arabic REAP-S effectively discriminated between different levels of dietary behavior among Arabic-speaking young adults. Conclusion: The Arabic REAP-S demonstrated strong validity and reliability, supporting its unidimensional structure and appropriate psychometric performance. Evidence from both CFA and Rasch analysis confirmed acceptable model fit, good internal consistency, and adequate item functioning. The instrument provides a brief and practical tool for assessing dietary behaviors among Arabic-speaking young adults in clinical and research settings. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care: The Arabic REAP-S provides nurses and other healthcare professionals with a brief, standardized tool for rapidly assessing dietary behaviors and identifying individuals at nutritional risk. Its integration into routine clinical and community practice may support early dietary screening, guide nutrition education, and strengthen evidence based preventive care for diet related chronic diseases.   Keywords: Arabic REAP-S; Dietary Screening; Confirmatory Factor Analysis; Rasch Measurement Theory; Construct Validity; Young Adults.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee (REC) at the University of Hail, Saudi Arabia (Ethical Approval No: H-2025-954). Written informed consent was obtained from all participating individuals before their enrollment in the study.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to institutional privacy policies and ethics considerations regarding participant confidentiality, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, subject to a data sharing agreement.